Showing 861 - 880 results of 103,919 for search '(( e non decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((wt decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.69s Refine Results
  1. 861
  2. 862
  3. 863
  4. 864

    Positive modulation of mGluR5 decreases spine density in the nucleus accumbens but not in the dorsal striatum. by Kellie S. Gross (3115299)

    Published 2016
    “…<p>(A) Twenty-four hours after systemic administration, CDPPB (5–10 mg/kg, <i>n</i> = 18 animals) decreased dendritic spine density and frequency of small head diameter spines (0.2 μm bin) compared to vehicle control (<i>n</i> = 8) in the nucleus accumbens core. …”
  5. 865
  6. 866
  7. 867
  8. 868

    The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size. by Liron Sheintuch (12078310)

    Published 2022
    “…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
  9. 869
  10. 870
  11. 871
  12. 872
  13. 873
  14. 874
  15. 875

    Abhd15 expression is regulated during adipogenesis and decreased by elevated free fatty acid levels. by Evelyn Walenta (484072)

    Published 2013
    “…Abhd15 mRNA expression is decreased in WAT and BAT of genetically obese mice (ob/ob) compared to wild type (wt) mice. …”
  16. 876

    Differences in abundance of lipid molecules in liver of <i>Fmo5</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> and WT mice. by Ian R. Phillips (5074121)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>(A) Volcano plot representation of lipid molecules (log<sub>2</sub>-fold change) of <i>Fmo5</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> vs WT mice. …”
  17. 877

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  18. 878
  19. 879
  20. 880