Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances impact human spermatogenesis in a stem-cell-derived model by Alyse N. Steves (5409011)

Behavioral classification of animals with the FULL and ECO models. by Naëmi Kuehn (17310359)

“…<p>(A,D) The left column shows the mean of the cross-validated votes (n = 1000) per observation per subject. …”

DataSheet1_Amygdalin as a chemoprotective agent in co-treatment with cisplatin.PDF by Panayiota Christodoulou (13832038)

“…As attested by flow cytometry, combination treatment was associated with decreased the percentage of late apoptotic cells compared with monotherapy (fold-change of decrease = 1.6 and 4.5 for 15 and 20 μΜ, respectively). …”

Life span assay for <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> infected with STEC strains compared to that for <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> infected with the control <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> OP50 strain. by Su-Bin Hwang (4898887)

“…<i>elegans</i> grown on the E5 and E6 strains. <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> grown on both E5 and E6 exhibited a decreased life span at the end of 10 days, but <i>C</i>. …”

Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Multi-Component, Artificial Tear on Preocular Tear Film Stability, Tear Evaporation and Tear Film Optical Dynamic: A Prospective Randomized Double... by Giancarlo Montani (13117815)

Electrochemistry as a Complementary Technique for Revealing the Influence of Reducing Agent Concentration on AgNPs. by Sapokazi Timakwe (14127576)

“…This process ended up in the formation of large aggregates that decrease the active surface area and therefore result in a significant decrease in their unique properties. …”

Curve fitting of UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fluctuation coefficient of UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Numerical simulation model. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Mechanical parameters. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fig 2 - by Pedro F. S. Freitas (10331819)

Correlation between angles representing metatarsal alignment and relevant variables when standing on the non–dominant leg. by Akiko Imura (7245170)

“…Graphs with black circle plots indicate significant correlations with the angle representing metatarsal alignment and variables after consideringeffects of the multiple testing. (a) the foot inverts as the angle 1-2-3 becomes significantly wider; (b)% duration to load medially decreases as the angle 1-2-3 becomes significantly wider; (c) the foot inversion/eversion angle does not correlate with the angle 2-3-4; (d) % duration to load medially does not correlate with the angle 2-3-4; (e) the foot inversion/eversion angle does not correlate with the angle 3-4-5; (f) % duration to load medially does not correlate with the angle 3-4-5.…”

Network configuration. by Julia Jäger (6690923)

Fitting relationship between rock size and UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Relationship between UCS and rock bridge angle. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

UCS under different rock bridge angle. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Regression parameters under different rock sizes. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fitting curves of UCS in different rock sizes. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

UCS under different rock size. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Relationship between CCS and rock bridge angle. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”