Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), a point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), a point (Expand Search)
-
37721
Hydrogen volume fraction change in the pipeline.
Published 2024“…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
-
37722
Mesh independence verification.
Published 2024“…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
-
37723
-
37724
-
37725
Valve parameters and simulation results.
Published 2024“…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
-
37726
-
37727
Undulation pipeline geometric modeling.
Published 2024“…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
-
37728
-
37729
-
37730
Time pressure: a controlled experiment of test case development and requirements review
Published 2020“…<div>REF: Mäntylä M. V., Petersen K., Lehtinen, T. O. A., Lassenius, C. …”
-
37731
Structure diagram of ensemble model.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37732
Fitting formula parameter table.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37733
Test plan.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37734
Fitting surface parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37735
Model generalisation validation error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37736
Empirical model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37737
Fitting curve parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37738
Test instrument.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37739
Empirical model establishment process.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
-
37740
Model prediction error trend chart.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”