Showing 37,721 - 37,740 results of 102,541 for search '(( e point decrease ) OR ( 5 ((step decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.54s Refine Results
  1. 37721

    Hydrogen volume fraction change in the pipeline. by Weiqing Xu (1279959)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
  2. 37722

    Mesh independence verification. by Weiqing Xu (1279959)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
  3. 37723
  4. 37724
  5. 37725

    Valve parameters and simulation results. by Weiqing Xu (1279959)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
  6. 37726
  7. 37727

    Undulation pipeline geometric modeling. by Weiqing Xu (1279959)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Hydrogen is a clean energy source, and blending it with natural gas in existing pipeline networks is a key transition solution for transportation cost reduction. …”
  8. 37728
  9. 37729
  10. 37730

    Time pressure: a controlled experiment of test case development and requirements review by Mika Mäntylä (406301)

    Published 2020
    “…<div>REF: Mäntylä M. V., Petersen K., Lehtinen, T. O. A., Lassenius, C. …”
  11. 37731

    Structure diagram of ensemble model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  12. 37732

    Fitting formula parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  13. 37733

    Test plan. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  14. 37734

    Fitting surface parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  15. 37735

    Model generalisation validation error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  16. 37736

    Empirical model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  17. 37737

    Fitting curve parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  18. 37738

    Test instrument. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  19. 37739

    Empirical model establishment process. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”
  20. 37740

    Model prediction error trend chart. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. Additionally, a secondary validation using experimental data from other researchers confirms the model’s good agreement with previous results, demonstrating its robust generalization ability. …”