Enhancement of biological effectiveness of carbon-ion beams by applying a longitudinal magnetic field by Taku Inaniwa (6239012)

“…</p> <p><b>Methods and materials:</b> Human cancer and normal cell lines were exposed to low (12 keV/<i>μ</i>m) and high (50 keV/<i>μ</i>m) linear energy transfer (LET) carbon-ion beams under the longitudinal magnetic fields of <i>B</i>_// = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.6 T generated by a solenoid magnet. …”

Contribution of a Non-β-Cell Source to β-Cell Mass during Pregnancy by Chiara Toselli (579816)

“…In addition, we observed a population of hormone-negative, Ngn3-positive cells in islets of both non-pregnant and pregnant mice, and this population dropped from 12% of all islets cells in the non-pregnant mice to 5% by day 8 of pregnancy. …”

DataSheet1_Effect of a probiotic and an antibiotic on the mobilome of the porcine microbiota.PDF by Xavier C. Monger (18267013)

“…Probiotics are often studied as a way to modulate the microbiome and are, therefore, an interesting way to potentially decrease antibiotic resistance.…”

Table 1_Muscle quality index and hyperuricemia: adipose tissue as a mediator.docx by Ya Shao (16975896)

“…Each one-unit increment in MQI corresponded to a 50% decrease in the odds of hyperuricemia (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.43–0.57). …”

Identification and Functional Validation of Caldesmon as a Potential Gastric Cancer Metastasis-associated Protein by Qian Hou (672015)

“…In total, 641 proteins were identified with at least a 95% confidence. Using cutoff values of >1.5 and <0.67, 19 proteins were found to be up-regulated and 34 were down-regulated in the metastatic versus primary gastric cancer cell lines respectively. …”

Supplementary Material for: Protective effects of Xanthohumol against diabetic nephropathy in a mouse model by Li F. (3206265)

“…Introduction: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a long-term loss of renal function occurring in the diabetic patients, leading to 5 million deaths in 2015, and this number is dramatically growing annually. …”

Life span assay for <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> infected with STEC strains compared to that for <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> infected with the control <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> OP50 strain. by Su-Bin Hwang (4898887)

“…<i>elegans</i> grown on the E5 and E6 strains. <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> grown on both E5 and E6 exhibited a decreased life span at the end of 10 days, but <i>C</i>. …”

Formation of actin-associated clusters. by Julia Jäger (6690923)

Fig 2 - by Mark J. Carroll (3605582)

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances impact human spermatogenesis in a stem-cell-derived model by Alyse N. Steves (5409011)

Curve fitting of UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fluctuation coefficient of UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Numerical simulation model. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Mechanical parameters. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fig 2 - by Pedro F. S. Freitas (10331819)

Fitting relationship between rock size and UCS. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Relationship between UCS and rock bridge angle. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

UCS under different rock bridge angle. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Regression parameters under different rock sizes. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”

Fitting curves of UCS in different rock sizes. by Gaojian Hu (11457537)

“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”