Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), a point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e point » _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search), a point (Expand Search)
-
1081
-
1082
-
1083
-
1084
GluN2A(D731N) decreases channel open probability.
Published 2017“…The di-heteromeric mutant (2A-D731N) and tri-heteromeric receptors with two-copies of the mutant subunit (D731N/D731N) showed a prolonged inhibition rate, reflecting a decreased channel open probability. …”
-
1085
-
1086
-
1087
-
1088
A Novel Highly Potent Autotaxin/ENPP2 Inhibitor Produces Prolonged Decreases in Plasma Lysophosphatidic Acid Formation <i>In Vivo</i> and Regulates Urethral Tension
Published 2014“…To date, several autotaxin/ENPP2 inhibitors have been reported; however, none were able to completely and continuously inhibit autotaxin/ENPP2 <i>in vivo</i>. In this study, we report the discovery of a highly potent autotaxin/ENPP2 inhibitor, ONO-8430506, which decreased plasma lysophosphatidic acid formation.…”
-
1089
-
1090
-
1091
-
1092
-
1093
-
1094
-
1095
-
1096
-
1097
-
1098
-
1099
Small Molecule ErbB Inhibitors Decrease Proliferative Signaling and Promote Apoptosis in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published 2013“…In two human Ph+ALL cell lines, inhibition of ErbB kinase activity with canertinib resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the phosphorylation of an ErbB kinase signaling target p70S6-kinase T389 (by 60% in Z119 and 39% in Z181 cells at 3 µM). …”
-
1100
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”