Search alternatives:
processing algorithm » modeling algorithm (Expand Search), routing algorithm (Expand Search), tracking algorithm (Expand Search)
query processing » pre processing (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
ipca algorithm » wgcna algorithm (Expand Search), cscap algorithm (Expand Search), ii algorithm (Expand Search)
element ipca » element data (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
processing algorithm » modeling algorithm (Expand Search), routing algorithm (Expand Search), tracking algorithm (Expand Search)
query processing » pre processing (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
ipca algorithm » wgcna algorithm (Expand Search), cscap algorithm (Expand Search), ii algorithm (Expand Search)
element ipca » element data (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
-
201
Range of point clouds.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
202
Results of ablation experiment.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
203
Transformer Encoder network structure.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
204
Line chart of frame rate.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
205
The total loss and three-component loss.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
206
Improved upsampling module based on Transformer.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
207
R project including metadata update.
Published 2025“…These problems appear to stem from both algorithmic limitations and deficiencies in submission and post-submission processes. …”
-
208
Classes of errors and gaps in BOLD metadata.
Published 2025“…These problems appear to stem from both algorithmic limitations and deficiencies in submission and post-submission processes. …”
-
209
-
210
-
211
-
212
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
Overall framework design.
Published 2025“…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …”
-
217
Gamma distribution of reuse.
Published 2025“…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …”
-
218
Top 5 correlated features based on reuse.
Published 2025“…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …”
-
219
Features with the top importance score.
Published 2025“…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …”
-
220