Search alternatives:
latest decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
latest decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. User satisfaction also improves, with a 19.5% increase in experience ratings. …”
-
9
-
10
Data of the article "The physiological cost of being hot: High thermal stress and disturbance decrease energy reserves in dragonflies in the wild"
Published 2025“…Despite this, individuals from disturbed sites were larger but had lower energy reserves than those from preserved sites. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
19
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
20