Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
8
-
9
Data and code from: Continental declines in North American small mammal populations
Published 2025“…To test this idea, we assembled from small mammal researchers 818 time series of small mammal abundances, containing a total of 5,317 individual abundance data points, for 66 species in 21 genera. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…(B) Hyaluronidase treatment (n = 8) gradually increased TEER, this significantly differed from the untreated group (n = 8) and the PS treated group (n = 8) (p < 0,001). …”
-
15
-
16
<b>The loss of insulin-positive cell clusters precedes the decrease of islet frequency and beta cell area in type 1 diabetes</b>
Published 2025“…Moreover, changes in endocrine composition also occurred in mAAb+ donors, including a significant decrease in the INS+ islet fraction. These data suggest preferential loss of INS+ small endocrine objects early in type 1 diabetes development.…”
-
17
-
18
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”