Showing 101 - 120 results of 5,481 for search '(( i ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( a ((laser decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.45s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102

    Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

    Published 2025
    “…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”
  3. 103

    Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

    Published 2025
    “…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”
  4. 104

    Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

    Published 2025
    “…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”
  5. 105

    Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

    Published 2025
    “…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”
  6. 106

    Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

    Published 2025
    “…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  14. 114

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  15. 115

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 116

    PBP1 depletion results in a population of cells with decreased RADA fluorescence. by Gregory A. Harrison (16639446)

    Published 2025
    “…Note that the P<sub>tet</sub>-<i>gusA</i> data from panel A (blue squares) was duplicated in panel B for comparison. >1300 cells were quantified across three independent experiments, and symbols represent the mean and standard error of the mean from three replicates.…”
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119
  20. 120

    Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65. by Natnicha Suttawong (22367172)

    Published 2025
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”