Obstacle degree of the PLES carrying capacity in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

The average obstacle degree of the PLES carrying capacity indicators in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

Distribution map of ecological space carrying capacity in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia. by A ruhan (20489164)

Distribution map of PLES carrying capacity in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia. by A ruhan (20489164)

Discount chart of PLES carrying capacity. by A ruhan (20489164)

“…The findings exhibited that (1) the distribution area of ecological space and production space decreased, while the living space area increased slightly; (2) The carrying capacity of production space showed a weak growth trend, the carrying capacity of production space, living space and the PLES space showed a weak downward trend; (3) The coupling degree and coupling coordination degree between two spaces show a slow downward trend; (4) The obstacle degree of the carrying capacity of production space and living space has increased, while the carrying capacity of ecological space is decreasing. …”

Spatial distribution map of the PLES function in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

Function combination map of the PLES in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia. by A ruhan (20489164)

Spatial variation diagram of coupling degree and coupling coordination degree of carrying capacity between ecological and production space. by A ruhan (20489164)

The coupling degree and coupling capacity scheduling change curve of the PLES in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

Distribution map of production space carrying capacity in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia. by A ruhan (20489164)

Index system and index weight of the PLES carrying capacity in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

Spatial variation diagram of coupling degree and coupling coordination degree of carrying capacity between ecological and living space. by A ruhan (20489164)

Obstacle degree of the PLES carrying capacity criterion layer in Duolun County. by A ruhan (20489164)

Spatial differentiation of coupling degree and coupling coordination degree of carrying capacity in PLES. by A ruhan (20489164)

General characteristics of study subjects. by Soo-Hee Hwang (17767519)

“…COVID-19 did not affect inpatient mortality (p = 0.9608), but in-hospital mortality decreased from 12% to 7% in the medical aid group.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Overall, we found that COVID-19 had an impact on admission rates of patients with AMI but did not have a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. …”

Synthesis and Stability Phase Diagram of Topological Semimetal Family LnSb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} by Tyger H. Salters (20381925)

“…The presence of structurally related LnTe₃ in samples suggests that stability is limited by the size of Ln, due to increasing compressive strain along the layer stacking axis with decreasing size. Finally, we demonstrate that late Ln can be stabilized in LnSb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} via substitution into larger Ln members, synthesizing La_1–<i>y</i>Ho_<i>y</i>Sb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} as a proof of concept.…”

Synthesis and Stability Phase Diagram of Topological Semimetal Family LnSb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} by Tyger H. Salters (20381925)

“…The presence of structurally related LnTe₃ in samples suggests that stability is limited by the size of Ln, due to increasing compressive strain along the layer stacking axis with decreasing size. Finally, we demonstrate that late Ln can be stabilized in LnSb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} via substitution into larger Ln members, synthesizing La_1–<i>y</i>Ho_<i>y</i>Sb_<i>x</i>Te_{2–<i>x</i>–δ} as a proof of concept.…”

(a) Changes of SOC (Soil organic matter) content during acification of black soil. The control group (0Y) received no fertilization, while the treatment groups included soils that... by Xiaoxu Zhu (11764430)

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”