Uncropped blots corresponding to Fig 3A, provided for assessment of band specificity and loading consistency. by Tetsuya Kakita (4922584)

General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period. by Kathryn Knodel (20036529)

GI-1d-a: Comparison of estimates of people for dataset A (left bar) and B (right bar) per region. The largest discrepancies occur in areas of NE, SE and SW Germany and adjacent reg... by Isabell Schmidt (6331013)

Percentage of exhale flux penetrating through the mask fabric for different values of <i>c</i>_<i>k</i>; a–c and d–f decreasing porosity for outward and inward protection... by Akshay Anand (118579)

Univariate linear regression analysis of scales. by Xiangyu Wang (341093)

Bead-spring model for linear DNA. by Fatema Tuz Zohra (11378812)

Selection and screening of study participants. by Weixin Chen (138569)

Subjects:

Linear single-track dynamics model. by Tuan Anh Nguyen (121944)

Multivariable Linear Regression Model of the Residents P-V Fit score^a. by Yaotian Fan (5917766)

Non-linear load’s individual harmonic currents as a percentage of the fundamental value for TS3. by Abdallah Aldosary (21370131)

Relationship between monthly NDVI and climatic variables values (Tmax, maximum air temperature; P, precipitation; VPD, vapor pressure deficit), in areas with decreasing trends (<i>... by Oswaldo Maillard (20660661)

Linear regression analysis of mice body weight. by Xin Zeng (174828)

Join-point regression analysis of the statistically significant linear decrease in use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, psychostimulants and nootropic drugs, anxiolytics, sedati... by Jelena Filimonovic (22305307)

Multiple linear regression analysis results. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

“…Cohesiveness varied without a clear linear trend, showing significant changes at specific IDDSI levels for meats, grains, and tubers (<i>p</i>≤0.05). …”

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”

<i>In silico</i> knockdown predictions on the basis of crosstalk models. by Elsje J. Burgers (20903422)

Contribution of the through-mask leakages from the cavity and channel network distributed along the periphery of the mask; a–c and d–f are decreasing porosity <i>c</i><sub><i>k</i>... by Akshay Anand (118579)

Data Sheet 1_Spatial and temporal variability in blue carbon accumulation in the largest salt marsh in British Columbia, Canada.docx by Karen E. Kohfeld (11936879)