Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
under increased » center increased (Expand Search), number increased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search)
a under » _ under (Expand Search), b under (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
under increased » center increased (Expand Search), number increased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search)
a under » _ under (Expand Search), b under (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Mean squared error of estimates decreases with larger datasets.
Published 2022“…<p>The mean squared error in the estimates of under the posterior distribution decreases as the size of the dataset increases. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
<i>E</i> values weakly decrease with absolute latitude.
Published 2020“…Note that values on the vertical axis increase exponentially. The data underlying this figure are available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12816140.v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12816140.v1</a>.…”
-
11
-
12
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. …”
-
13
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs).
Published 2021“…The corresponding graph to the right illustrates how the discounted value (<i>V</i>) of the LLR decreases hyperbolically according to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0259830#pone.0259830.e001" target="_blank">Eq 1</a> (in this example, <i>k</i> = 0.003). …”