Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
6741
Balance test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6742
Mechanism analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6743
Endogenous test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6744
Heterogeneity analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6745
Robustness test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6746
Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6747
The influencing factors of RLM.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6748
Variable definitions and basic statistics.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6749
Average and marginal effects of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. …”
-
6750
Perturbational input-output matrix in feedback-driven condition.
Published 2025“…Red signifies an increase in the mean firing rate exceeding 20% above the initial value (with only input to L5), blue denotes a decrease greater than 20%, and white represents a change less than 20%. …”
-
6751
Figure 6 from Gut Microbiome Profiling in Eμ-TCL1 Mice Reveals Intestinal Changes and a Dysbiotic Signature Specific to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published 2025“…<b>B,</b> CLL disease burden was measured by the percentage of CD45<sup>+</sup>/CD19<sup>+</sup>/CD5<sup>+</sup> cells in the peripheral blood via flow cytometric analysis beginning at 1 week after engraftment (<i>n</i> = 10 mice/cohort). …”
-
6752
Data Sheet 1_Association between the systemic immune-inflammatory index and the immune response after hepatitis B vaccination: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.docx
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we utilized restricted cubic splines (RCSs) to analyze the linear relationship between the two variables.</p>Results<p>In our study, we included a total of 6,123 patients, of whom 2,770 tested positive for hepatitis B antibodies. …”
-
6753
Image 1_Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of primary liver perivascular epithelioid cell tumor with renal angiomyolipoma: a case report and literature rev...
Published 2025“…The patient presented with multiple fatty lesions in both kidneys, with the larger one located in the lower part of the left kidney, which was eventually confirmed as angiomyolipoma through surgical pathology. …”
-
6754
Table 1_The cerebral metabolic mechanism of group computer magnanimous therapy based on magnetic resonance spectroscopy: effects on improving magnanimous-enterprising levels of lun...
Published 2024“…Significant increases in NAA/Cr levels were observed in the right amygdala, and significant decreases in mI/Cr levels were observed in the right cingulate gyrus in the GCMTG. …”
-
6755
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
6756
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
6757
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
6758
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
6759
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
6760