Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
laser decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
laser decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
801
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
802
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
803
Funnel plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
804
-
805
-
806
RipU<sup>K60</sup> decreases microtubule abundance at 48 hours post infiltration.
Published 2024“…Values were averaged as one biological sample (n). …”
-
807
-
808
5-HT inhibits <i>P</i>. <i>berghei</i> infection in mosquitoes.
Published 2024“…(B and D) The abundance of each metabolite was normalized to the mean value of the healthy groups and shown as log2. Significantly altered metabolites (B-H FDR < 0.1, log<sub>2</sub>(FC) > 1) are highlighted in blue (decreased) and red (increased), respectively. …”
-
809
-
810
-
811
-
812
-
813
-
814
Estimation and prediction of the incidence <i>I</i>(<i>t</i>) in synthetic data.
Published 2024“…For each of these scenarios, we consider four testing and reporting models (see <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012687#sec009" target="_blank">Methods</a> for details): constant reporting exponent <i>n</i> = −1 and testing that grows indefinitely with incidence (left column); constant reporting exponent <i>n</i> = −2 and testing that grows indefinitely with incidence (center-left column); variable reporting exponent <i>n</i> = −<i>α</i> log <i>C</i> and testing that grows indefinitely with incidence (center-right column); variable reporting exponent <i>n</i> = −<i>α</i> log <i>C</i> and testing that saturates at high incidence values (right column). …”
-
815
-
816
-
817
-
818
-
819
Carbon (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N) isotope data from bone collagen from archaeological fauna and modern plants in the isthmus area, including Cos...
Published 2025“…<p>Norr’s [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0335678#pone.0335678.ref105" target="_blank">105</a>] modern plant <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values have been adjusted here by +1.5‰ to account for the Suess effect [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0335678#pone.0335678.ref176" target="_blank">176</a>], as she specified that her reported values were not corrected for the difference between preindustrial and modern decrease in <sup>13</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> (vs <sup>12</sup>CO<sub>2</sub>) due to the burning of fossil fuels.…”
-
820