Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
mri decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
flow » low (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
mri decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
flow » low (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
CONSORT 2025 Flow Diagram [70].
Published 2025“…<div><p>This study aimed to investigate how body position (supine, seated, and standing) influences post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) and autonomic nervous system activity, with implications for vascular health and the safety of blood flow-restricted (BFR) exercise. A prospective, within-subject design was implemented. …”
-
6
The Laboratory Animal Flow Diagram.
Published 2025“…Meanwhile, Kylo-0603 demonstrated a marked improvement in histological parameters, decreasing steatosis by up to 1.3 points (P < 0.001), inflammation by 1.8 points (P < 0.0001), and ballooning by 0.8 points (P < 0.01). …”
-
7
-
8
Parameters and values of social force model.
Published 2024“…By analyzing the flow data of bidirectional flows in the crossing area, it is found that when the Peds1 density falls below a threshold, Peds1 speed is determined by pedestrians themselves and mainly remains in a free flow state; otherwise, the Peds1 speed decreases with density. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Prisma flow diagram of study selection.
Published 2025“…Additionally, watching ≥6 hours of television per day was associated with a significant decrease in cognitive score (standardized beta coefficient = −0.09; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.8%; seven studies). …”