Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
421
-
422
-
423
Disruption of bacterial K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis decreases Mtb colonization of macrophages.
Published 2019“…Each point on the graph represents a bacterium or a tight cluster of bacteria (black circles—WT, red squares– Δ<i>ceoBC</i>, blue triangles—<i>ceoBC</i>*). p-values were obtained with a Mann-Whitney statistical test. …”
-
424
-
425
-
426
-
427
-
428
-
429
-
430
Knockdown of AR expression decreases the efficiency of KSHV infection in endothelial cells.
Published 2017“…Data are shown as the mean±SEM; n = 3. Paired Student’s <i>t</i>-tests and one-way ANOVA analysis was respectively performed on (b, c, e and f) and (d, h). * p,0.05, ** p,0.01, <sup>n.s.…”
-
431
SLE T cells display more genes with increased rather than decreased expression.
Published 2015“…<p><b>A)</b> Distribution of expression stratified at the 1.5-, 2-fold and q<0.05 CUFFDIFF2 significance levels. …”
-
432
-
433
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…<p>A) C57BL/6 mice or CCR2 KO mice receiving Gr1-depleting antibody were infected with either 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> NMII <i>Coxiella</i>. …”
-
434
Allelic loss of <i>Cdh11</i> led to faster growing tumors due to decreased cell death.
Published 2010“…The ratio of tumor volume in pixels at PND84 to the average number of TAg-positive cells per eye at PND8 for the three genotypes was used to estimate tumor growth rate. A significant difference in growth rate between groups was observed (p = 0.003), with a 3-fold increase between <i>Cdh11</i><sup>-/-</sup> and wild type mice. …”
-
435
-
436
-
437
-
438
-
439
-
440