Showing 861 - 880 results of 129,079 for search '(( i d decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((nn decrease) OR (point decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.77s Refine Results
  1. 861
  2. 862
  3. 863
  4. 864

    Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity. by Ghattas Bisharat (20706928)

    Published 2025
    “…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
  5. 865
  6. 866
  7. 867
  8. 868
  9. 869
  10. 870
  11. 871
  12. 872
  13. 873
  14. 874

    A decrease in cellular RNA increases the insolubility of TDP-43. by Shinnosuke Takagi (428655)

    Published 2013
    “…(C) Immunoblots of the immunoprecipitated protein with anti-V5 antibody or control IgG. (D) Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) of hNFL from immunoprecipitated RNA. …”
  15. 875
  16. 876
  17. 877

    Juvenile demyelination leads to a substantial decrease in potassium currents in PV interneurons of the PFC. by Sara Hijazi (21656615)

    Published 2025
    “…Representative traces of TEA-sensitive potassium currents (1mM). <b>D</b>. TEA-sensitive currents were specifically decreased in PV interneurons from mice that received cuprizone treatment compared to control mice (<i>group x voltage two-way repeated measures: n = 10,14 cells from 5 mice per group: F(13,286) = 5.082, p < 0.0001</i>). …”
  18. 878
  19. 879
  20. 880

    2-CDA decreases PIN 1 protein levels in 7WD10 cells. by Crystal D. Hayes (304487)

    Published 2013
    “…(B) ImageJ quantitation revealed significantly decreased PIN 1 protein levels at 0.1 mM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 µM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 µM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 µM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 µM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells n = 4 in each group. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, vs. untreated controls.…”