Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
101641
Label data volume and label distribution.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101642
The structure of the context guided block.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101643
SEnet module.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101644
Cracks included in the dataset.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101645
Loss function comparison plot.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101646
Edge device performance benchmarking.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101647
Typical error cases.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101648
Computational efficiency comparison.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101649
Backbone comparison in crack detection.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101650
Statistical analysis table for ablation tests.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101651
Summary of false positives and false negatives.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101652
PR parameter comparison chart.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101653
RAK-Conv.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101654
Structure of YOLOv8n.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the model achieves a 6.55% reduction in size and a 0.03% decrease in computational complexity. …”
-
101655
T<sub>2</sub>* weighted MRI successfully detect massive red cell congestion (RCC) in 1h cardiac death (CD1h) and CD2h kidney grafts.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) T<sub>2</sub>* weighted images of CD 0, 1 and 2 h kidney grafts before transplantation. …”
-
101656
Stride time across measurement sessions.
Published 2023“…Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.686) and 3 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.875). …”
-
101657
Gait stability retention.
Published 2023“…Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.686) and 3 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.875). …”
-
101658
Gait stability across measurement sessions.
Published 2023“…Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.686) and 3 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.875). …”
-
101659
Treadmill with safety harness.
Published 2023“…Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.686) and 3 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.875). …”
-
101660
Step width across measurement sessions.
Published 2023“…Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.686) and 3 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.875). …”