Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1121
-
1122
-
1123
-
1124
-
1125
5-HT inhibits <i>P</i>. <i>berghei</i> infection in mosquitoes.
Published 2024“…Each dot represented an individual mouse. (C and E) The fold change of the metabolite level in <i>Plasmodium</i> infected groups was normalized to the mean of that in healthy ones. …”
-
1126
-
1127
Metformin pre-treatment retains an antioxidant effect and decreases apoptosis, in an AMPK activation manner.
Published 2024“…(E, F) Metformin activates AMPK through the phosphorylation at Thr 172 (One-way ANOVA, *p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***p<0.001, **** p<0.0001).…”
-
1128
-
1129
Image 2_Probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 decreases urothelial cell invasion and enhances macrophage killing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in vitro study.tiff
Published 2024“…The human bladder epithelial cell line UM-UC-3 was used to assess the adhesion and pathogen-attachment inhibition properties of AC5 on UPEC.</p>Results and discussion<p>Our data showed that AC5 can attach to UM-UC-3 and decrease UPEC attachment in a dose-dependent manner. …”
-
1130
Decrease in sequencing cost, compared to Moore
Published 2014“…<p>Depiction of the cost to sequence one raw megabase of DNA, in dollars (adapted from [1]). …”
-
1131
-
1132
-
1133
-
1134
-
1135
-
1136
-
1137
-
1138
-
1139
At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP.
Published 2010“…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”
-
1140