Search alternatives:
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1921
-
1922
-
1923
-
1924
-
1925
-
1926
-
1927
-
1928
-
1929
-
1930
PI(3)P and VPS34 lipid kinase activity is decreased in <i>Becn1</i> deficient MEFs.
Published 2014“…Quantification of 450 nm absorbance of control, <i>Becn1</i> deficient, and <i>Becn1</i> revertant MEFs (6,5,6 replicates); statistics using a one-tailed t-test p = 0.0032, 0.0336. …”
-
1931
-
1932
-
1933
-
1934
-
1935
-
1936
MT treatment in the <i>in vivo</i> OS animal model decreased body weight and increased tumor size.
Published 2014“…The results showed that MT (+) group showed decreased body weight (E, 30.5±0.65 g, ▪) and increased tumor volume (F, 8.3±1.18 mm<sup>3</sup>, ▪) compared to MT (−) group with body weight (E, 35.8±0.40 g, □) and tumor volume (F, 3.9±1.34 mm<sup>3</sup>, □), respectively. (*, p<0.05 compare with MT (+) versus MT (−) groups).…”
-
1937
-
1938
-
1939
NaSal increased the excitability of 5-HTergic neurons, but decreased that of GABAergic neurons in the DRN of the ChR2 transgenic mouse.
Published 2015“…<p>(A) Sample traces (left panel) and group data (right panel, two RM-ANOVA and paired Student’s <i>t</i>-test) showing that NaSal increased the current-evoked firing of 5-HTergic neurons with enhanced GABAergic inhibition by optical stimulation (450 ms, 18.3 mW, 473 nm). …”
-
1940