Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
et decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
i et » i e (Expand Search), i ex (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
et decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
i et » i e (Expand Search), i ex (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Expression of the ETS-5 target gene <i>gcy-9</i> restores CO<sub>2</sub>-chemosensitivity to <i>ets-5</i> mutants.
Published 2012“…<p>(A) <i>gcy-36</i> and <i>gcy-18</i> promoters, which are active in oxygen-sensing and thermosensory neurons, respectively, are not regulated by ETS-5. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The ratio 2-NBDG/R<sub>D</sub> facilitates assessment of glucose demand in heterogeneous regions of metastatic mammary tumors.
Published 2014“…After correction for low R<sub>D</sub>, 2-NBDG<sub>60</sub>/R<sub>D</sub> increased slightly but significantly in hypoxic regions (p<0.01 for 02,4T1<10 vs. 402,4T1<60). For 4T07, 2-NBDG uptake for the highest SO<sub>2,4T07</sub> regions decreased compared to the lowest SO<sub>2,4T07</sub> (p<0.01 for all 202,4T07<40 vs. 602,4T1<80). …”
-
13
Relationship between trial-to-trial formant change and N1 suppression.
Published 2013“…We found an overall trial Consistency effect on N1 suppression (<i>p</i> = .048) as well as a greater Near versus Far effect on SIS (<i>p</i> = .014), showing decreased N1 suppression when an utterance varies highly from its previous neighbor.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
File S1 - Diminished Vision in Healthy Aging Is Associated with Increased Retinal L-Type Voltage Gated Calcium Channel Ion Influx
Published 2013“…Mirrors placed on the floor and ceiling reflected a moving sine wave grating, displayed and distorted identically on each screen with Vision Egg (v.1.0), thereby forming a virtual barrel (i.e., the width of one dark-light-dark cycle appearing similar in all directions) when viewed from the center of the device. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Measurements and analysis of colon crypt production.
Published 2013“…(E) “Stage 2” and “Stage 1+2” crypt budding rates, showing a significant decrease with mice age. …”
-
20
Forests to Faucets 2.0
Published 2024“…As developed in Forests to Faucets (USFS 2011), the Important Areas for Surface Drinking Water (IMP) model can be broken down into two parts: IMPn = (PRn) * (Qn)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023IMP_RIMP, Important Areas for Surface Drinking Water (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023NON_FORESTAcres of non-forestPADUS and NLCDPRIVATE_FORESTAcres of private forestPADUS and NLCDPROTECTED_FORESTAcres of protected forest (State, Local, NGO, Permanent Easement)PADUS, NCED, and NLCDNFS_FORESTAcres of National Forest System (NFS) forestPADUS and NLCDFEDERAL_FORESTAcres of Other Federal forest (Non-NFS Federal)PADUS and NLCDPER_FORPRIPercent Private ForestCalculated using ArcGISPER_FORNFSPercent NFS ForestCalculated using ArcGISPER_FORPROPercent Protected (Other State, Local, NGO, Permanent Easement, NFS, and Federal) ForestCalculated using ArcGISWFP_HI_ACAcres with High and Very High Wildfire Hazard Potential (WHP)Dillon, 2018PER_WFPPercent of HU 12 with High and Very High Wildfire Hazard Potential (WHP)Dillon, 2018PER_IDRISKPercent of HU 12 that is at risk for mortality - 25% of standing live basal area greater than one inch in diameter will die over a 15- year time frame (2013 to 2027) due to insects and diseases.Krist, et Al,. 2014PERDEV_1040_45% Landuse Change 2010-2040 (low)ICLUSPERDEV_1090_45% Landuse Change 2010-2090 (low)ICLUSPERDEV_1040_85% Landuse Change 2010-2040 (high)ICLUSPERDEV_1090_85% Landuse Change 2010-2090 (high)ICLUSPER_Q40_45% Water Yield Change 2010-2040 (low) WASSI , Updated September 2023PER_Q90_45% Water Yield Change 2010-2090 (low) WASSI , Updated September 2023PER_Q40_85% Water Yield Change 2010-2040 (high) WASSI , Updated September 2023PER_Q90_85% Water Yield Change 2010-2090 (high) WASSI , Updated September 2023WFP(APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_WFP )/ 10,000Wildfire Threat to Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023IDRISK(APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_IDRISK )/ 10,000Insect & Disease Threat to Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023DEV1040_45(APCW_R * IMP_R * PERDEV_1040_45)/ 10,000 Landuse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (low emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023DEV1090_45(APCW_R * IMP_R * PERDEV_1090_45)/ 10,000 Landuse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (high emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023DEV1040_85(APCW_R * IMP_R * PERDEV_1040_85)/ 10,000 Landuse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (low emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023DEV1090_85(APCW_R * IMP_R * PERDEV_1090_85)/ 10,000 Landuse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (high emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023Q1040_45-1 * (APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_Q40_45)/ 10,000 Water Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (low emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023Q1090_45-1 * (APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_Q90_45)/ 10,000 Water Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (high emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023Q1040_85-1 * (APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_Q40_85)/ 10,000 Water Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (low emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023Q1090_85-1 * (APCW_R * IMP_R * PER_Q90_85)/ 10,000 Water Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (high emissions) Calculated using ArcGIS, Updated September 2023WFP_IMP_RWildfire Threat to Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023IDRISK_RInsect & Disease Threat to Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023DEV40_45_RLanduse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (low emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023DEV40_85_RLanduse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (high emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023DEV90_45_RLanduse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (low emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023DEV90_85_RLanduse Change in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (high emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023Q40_45_RWater Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (low emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023Q40_85_RWater Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2040 (high emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023Q90_45_RWater Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (low emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023Q90_85_RWater Yield Decrease in Important Surface Drinking Water Watersheds 2010-2090 (high emissions) (0-100 Quantiles)Calculated using R, Updated September 2023RegionUS Forest Service Region numberUSFSRegionnameUS Forest Service Region nameUSFSHUC_Num_DiffThis field compares the value in column HUC12(circa 2019 wbd) with the value in HUC_12 (circa 2009 wassi)-1 = No equivalent WASSI HUC. …”