Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
i large » ai large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
i large » ai large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
19
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
20