Showing 1 - 20 results of 6,629 for search '(( i means decrease ) OR ((( a ((step decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( a marker decrease ))))', query time: 0.76s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65. by Natnicha Suttawong (22367172)

    Published 2025
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i> by Razia Rashid Rahil (22772495)

    Published 2025
    “…(B, C) Summarized bar graph showed EVO significantly decreased calcium deposition and calcium content in CER treated P<sub>i</sub>-induced VSMCs. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  11. 11

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20