Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
late decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
late decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
9
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>)....
Published 2025“…Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>). …”
-
15
Flowchart of the analysis steps and methods used in the study (see details in sections 2.1 to 2.5).
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
-
17
Input parameter ranking for discrete measurements: Each column displays parameters (P) and their influence values (E) calculated using Eq 11, shown in decreasing order of influence. Results are presented for progressively expanding discrete measurement sets (from Set 1 to Set 3F). Only parameters with influence values greater than 0.01 are shown.
Published 2025“…Results are presented for progressively expanding discrete measurement sets (from Set 1 to Set 3F). Only parameters with influence values greater than 0.01 are shown.…”
-
18
-
19
-
20