Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
11
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
12
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>)....
Published 2025“…Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>). …”
-
18
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
-
19
Input parameter ranking for discrete measurements: Each column displays parameters (P) and their influence values (E) calculated using Eq 11, shown in decreasing order of influence. Results are presented for progressively expanding discrete measurement sets (from Set 1 to Set 3F). Only parameters with influence values greater than 0.01 are shown.
Published 2025“…Results are presented for progressively expanding discrete measurement sets (from Set 1 to Set 3F). Only parameters with influence values greater than 0.01 are shown.…”
-
20