Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>)....
Published 2025“…Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>). …”
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
Data Sheet 1_Prognostic impact of dynamic changes of type I melanoma antigen gene proteins CT7 (MAGE-C1/CT7) transcripts in multiple myeloma.docx
Published 2025“…Our data showed the predictive value of peri-ASCT frontline treatment. A 2-log decrease of MAGE-C1/CT7 post-induction cycle 2 compared to baseline correlated with a negative peri-ASCT MAGE-C1/CT7 status, providing an earlier prognostic marker of treatment response.…”
-
116
-
117
Study 1_CFA1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
118
-
119
-
120