Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
i wt » _ wt (Expand Search), i w (Expand Search), i et (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
i wt » _ wt (Expand Search), i w (Expand Search), i et (Expand Search)
-
121
Nasal mucociliary clearance was decreased in <i>Ttll1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice.
Published 2015“…(E) Concentration of Evans blue in the nasal cavity and stomach 90 min after administration. In the <i>Ttll1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice, a larger amount of Evans blue persisted in the nasal cavity and a lesser amount was swallowed compared with that in the wild-type (WT) mice (mean ± SEM, n = 5, *P < 0.005 by two-tailed Student's t test).…”
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
DHT increases whereas orchidectomy decreases the seminal vesicle weight in wild-type and SOD1-G93A mice.
Published 2013“…Conversely, orchidectomy decreased the seminal vesicle weight in both WT mice (28.4±13 mg, <i>p</i><0.0001) and SOD1 mice (20.8±3.5 mg, <i>p</i><0.0001) compared with control WT and SOD1 mice, respectively. …”
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
Decrease of locomotor activity in <i>Auts2</i> mutant mice during habituation.
Published 2016“…Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (A: WT, n = 17, <i>Auts2</i><sup><i>neo/+</i></sup> = 14 and B: WT, n = 10, <i>Auts2</i><sup><i>neo/+</i></sup> = 9). …”
-
135
Deletion of STX1B decreases the size of RRP in glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses.
Published 2014“…Mean RRP size estimated from integral charge transfer induced by application of 0.5 M sucrose solution (right; WT, 2.27±0.17 nC, <i>n</i> = 88; STX1B<sup>−/−</sup>, 1.39±0.14 nC, <i>n</i> = 62; <i>p</i><0.001, two sample <i>t</i>-test). …”
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140