Showing 781 - 800 results of 104,049 for search '(( i wt decrease ) OR ( 5 ((step decrease) OR (((teer decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.45s Refine Results
  1. 781

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  2. 782

    A decrease in the invasiveness of <i>Candida albicans</i> into Caco-2 cells parallels the differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells. by Marianne Goyer (2550589)

    Published 2016
    “…Caco-2 cell differentiation increased throughout the culture as highlighted by the increase in TEER measurements (Ω.cm<sup>2</sup>) (full line), which correlated with a decrease in <i>C</i>. …”
  3. 783
  4. 784

    Binding of <i>PC3/Tis21</i> to the <i>Id3</i> promoter and corresponding decrease of <i>Id3</i> mRNA. by Stefano Farioli-Vecchioli (256006)

    Published 2009
    “…A scheme above the graph describes the <i>Id3</i> gene and the promoter region analyzed, 700 nt 5′ to the transcription start. …”
  5. 785
  6. 786

    HAM-5-GFP localization in WT and Δ<i>mak-2</i> germlings. by Wilfried Jonkers (160931)

    Published 2014
    “…(D) Western blots of WT, WT (<i>ham-5-gfp</i>) and Δ<i>mak-2</i> (<i>ham-5-gfp</i>) germlings with immunoprecipitated HAM-5-GFP probed with anti-GFP antibodies (right panel shows longer run showing higher mobility of HAM-5-GFP in wild type germlings) specifically detecting HAM-5-GFP (210 kD; <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004783#pgen.1004783.s004" target="_blank">Figure S4D</a>). …”
  7. 787
  8. 788
  9. 789

    Mutant channel with deletion of the S10 region has decreased surface expression in a stable HEK293 cell line. by Shumin Bian (191969)

    Published 2011
    “…Surface to total ratios were obtained by integration of the histograms. There is a 40% decrease in surface protein expression for the HSloΔS10 mutant determined by the surface to total HSlo ratio (+/− SEM, p = 0.032 in two sample t-test .n = 5).…”
  10. 790
  11. 791
  12. 792
  13. 793
  14. 794
  15. 795
  16. 796
  17. 797
  18. 798
  19. 799
  20. 800