Search alternatives:
implementing learner » implementing partner (Expand Search), implementing partners (Expand Search), implementing change (Expand Search)
learner algorithm » learning algorithm (Expand Search), learning algorithms (Expand Search), search algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
ore algorithm » rf algorithm (Expand Search), rl algorithm (Expand Search), erf algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
element ore » element te (Expand Search), element fbe (Expand Search), element ree (Expand Search)
implementing learner » implementing partner (Expand Search), implementing partners (Expand Search), implementing change (Expand Search)
learner algorithm » learning algorithm (Expand Search), learning algorithms (Expand Search), search algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
ore algorithm » rf algorithm (Expand Search), rl algorithm (Expand Search), erf algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
element ore » element te (Expand Search), element fbe (Expand Search), element ree (Expand Search)
-
181
-
182
-
183
Range of point clouds.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
184
Results of ablation experiment.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
185
Transformer Encoder network structure.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
186
Line chart of frame rate.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
187
The total loss and three-component loss.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
188
Improved upsampling module based on Transformer.
Published 2025“…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …”
-
189
-
190
-
191
-
192
Notation guide.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
193
Decision tree evaluation.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
194
CNN model evaluation.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
195
ROC curve CNN.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
196
RCNN model evaluation.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
197
Accuracy of ML classifiers.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
198
Random forest evaluation.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
199
ROC curve RCNN.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”
-
200
Correlation matrix.
Published 2025“…The hybrid stacking approach did an excellent implementation using Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost as base learners with Gradient Boosting as a meta-learner, which managed to record an accuracy of 90%. …”