Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
-
284
-
285
-
286
-
287
-
288
Parameters used in the simulations.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
289
Two ellipsoidal particles in contact.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
290
Different contact patterns for two ellipsoids.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
291
-
292
-
293
-
294
-
295
-
296
-
297
-
298
-
299
-
300
Comparison site multivariate distance summaries.
Published 2025“…The rate of plastics and paper disposal in NYC decreased. NYC data largely conformed to trends from the 88 other waste composition studies and did not generally agree with EPA data sets. …”