Search alternatives:
solution optimization » production optimization (Expand Search), reaction optimization (Expand Search), function optimization (Expand Search)
well optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), field optimization (Expand Search)
based solution » based solutions (Expand Search), based selection (Expand Search), based simulation (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
based well » based cell (Expand Search), based web (Expand Search), based all (Expand Search)
lens » less (Expand Search)
solution optimization » production optimization (Expand Search), reaction optimization (Expand Search), function optimization (Expand Search)
well optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), field optimization (Expand Search)
based solution » based solutions (Expand Search), based selection (Expand Search), based simulation (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
based well » based cell (Expand Search), based web (Expand Search), based all (Expand Search)
lens » less (Expand Search)
-
1
Lens imaging opposition-based learning.
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
2
-
3
DE algorithm flow.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
4
Compare algorithm parameter settings.
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
5
Test results of different algorithms.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-value on CEC2022 (dim = 20).
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
10
Precision elimination strategy.
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
11
Results of low-light image enhancement test.
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
12
-value on 23 benchmark functions (dim = 30).
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
13
Evaluation metrics obtained by SBOA and MESBOA.
Published 2025“…The algorithm integrates three key strategies: a precise population elimination strategy, which optimizes the population structure by eliminating individuals with low fitness and intelligently generating new ones; a lens imaging-based opposition learning strategy, which expands the exploration of the solution space through reflection and scaling to reduce the risk of local optima; and a boundary control strategy based on the best individual, which effectively constrains the search range to avoid inefficient searches and premature convergence. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
Parameter settings of the comparison algorithms.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
17
Plan frame of the house.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
18
Ablation test results.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
19
Hyperparameter selection test.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
20
Multiple index test results of different methods.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”