Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
library based » laboratory based (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
binary base » binary mask (Expand Search), ciliary base (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
codon » colon (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
library based » laboratory based (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
binary base » binary mask (Expand Search), ciliary base (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
codon » colon (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
RosettaAMRLD: A Reaction-Driven Approach for Structure-Based Drug Design from Combinatorial Libraries with Monte Carlo Metropolis Algorithms
Published 2025“…The Rosetta automated Monte Carlo reaction-based ligand design (RosettaAMRLD) integrates a Monte Carlo Metropolis (MCM) algorithm and reaction-driven molecule proposal to enhance structure-based <i>de novo</i> drug discovery. …”
-
3
Comparison based on hard instances from [79].
Published 2025“…Secondly, based on the data libraries of the IPMMPO, two tuple sets suitable for constraint programming modeling are further designed as data preprocessing. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
An optimal solution for the HFS instance.
Published 2025“…Secondly, based on the data libraries of the IPMMPO, two tuple sets suitable for constraint programming modeling are further designed as data preprocessing. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Fine-Tuning a Genetic Algorithm for CAMD: A Screening-Guided Warm Start
Published 2025“…In response to these challenges, this work presents a method to fine-tune a genetic algorithm for CAMD. The proposed method builds on the COSMO-CAMD framework that utilizes a genetic algorithm for solving optimization-based molecular design problems and COSMO-RS for predicting physical properties of molecules. …”
-
18
Fine-Tuning a Genetic Algorithm for CAMD: A Screening-Guided Warm Start
Published 2025“…In response to these challenges, this work presents a method to fine-tune a genetic algorithm for CAMD. The proposed method builds on the COSMO-CAMD framework that utilizes a genetic algorithm for solving optimization-based molecular design problems and COSMO-RS for predicting physical properties of molecules. …”
-
19
SSA4LSMOP
Published 2024“…<p dir="ltr">SSA4LSMOP is a multi-objective optimization algorithm library, which aims to provide researchers and developers with efficient and easy-to-use multi-objective optimization solutions. …”
-
20
Addressing Imbalanced Classification Problems in Drug Discovery and Development Using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AutoGluon-Tabular, and H2O AutoML
Published 2025“…The important findings of our studies are as follows: (i) there is no effect of threshold optimization on ranking metrics such as AUC and AUPR, but AUC and AUPR get affected by class-weighting and SMOTTomek; (ii) for ML methods RF and SVM, significant percentage improvement up to 375, 33.33, and 450 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy, which are suitable for performance evaluation of imbalanced data sets; (iii) for AutoML libraries AutoGluon-Tabular and H2O AutoML, significant percentage improvement up to 383.33, 37.25, and 533.33 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy; (iv) the general pattern of percentage improvement in balanced accuracy is that the percentage improvement increases when the class ratio is systematically decreased from 0.5 to 0.1; in the case of F1 score and MCC, maximum improvement is achieved at the class ratio of 0.3; (v) for both ML and AutoML with balancing, it is observed that any individual class-balancing technique does not outperform all other methods on a significantly higher number of data sets based on F1 score; (vi) the three external balancing techniques combined outperformed the internal balancing methods of the ML and AutoML; (vii) AutoML tools perform as good as the ML models and in some cases perform even better for handling imbalanced classification when applied with imbalance handling techniques. …”