Bivariate analysis using line plot for casing, bearing & impeller vs pressure. حسب Gaurav Sandeep Dave (21519884)

Performance comparison of neural UCB strategies based on the basal ganglia model against other UCB algorithms in different bandit tasks. حسب Yuhao Wang (196321)

Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. حسب Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Distributions of model parameters mirror differentially expressed ion channel genes. حسب Daniele Linaro (227790)

tUbenet Foundation Model Weights حسب Natalie Holroyd (7099391)

Flowchart of software workflow. حسب Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Precision Recall AUC values for different synthetic datasets and top-ranked models <i>M</i>*. حسب Simeone Marino (81051)

UK Biobank data wrangling statistics and results. حسب Simeone Marino (81051)

Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment حسب Jianfang Cao (1881379)

"…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …"

Experimental observation of gastruloids and shape quantification using LOCO-EFA. حسب Martijn A. de Jong (17896732)

Fig 3 - حسب Ali Ahmed (2567584)

Sample image for illustration. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"

Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR. حسب Linus Woitke (22783534)

"…The image is then cleaned in c) using morphological filtering with an <i>opening</i> operation to remove small-scale noise. …"

Image1_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF حسب Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Image3_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF حسب Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Image2_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF حسب Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Comparison analysis of computation time. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"

Process flow diagram of CBFD. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"

Precision recall curve. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"