Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations
Published 2025“…Increasing MSI led to a flattening of the NPs on the support as well as to decreasing Co dispersion but hardly affected the site distribution, suggesting that they do not alter the NPs intrinsic activity. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
10
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”
-
11
-
12
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units.
Published 2025“…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20