Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Test block.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
9
Test joint.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Volitional control frequency and intensity in VH (Kapsner-Smith et al., 2025)
Published 2025“…Specifically, unusually large responses to perturbations of vocal auditory feedback cannot be explained by a broader impairment of the ability to make small changes in the vocal parameters <i>F</i>0 or intensity. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20