Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Test block.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
3
Test joint.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
4
-
5
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Comparison of forward resistance.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
14
Boundary condition.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
15
The three-dimensional model of the steering rib.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
16
Force analysis of the system.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
17
Force analysis of a single rib.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
18
The self-resetting displacement sensor.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
19
Fig 13 -
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
20
Stress nephogram of different models.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”