Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,095 for search '(( making a decrease ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations by Enrico Sireci (12127349)

    Published 2025
    “…Increasing MSI led to a flattening of the NPs on the support as well as to decreasing Co dispersion but hardly affected the site distribution, suggesting that they do not alter the NPs intrinsic activity. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>This paper theoretically explores the propagation attenuation of normally incident P-waves on a single uncoupled joint exhibiting nonlinear deformation behavior. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units. by Thomas S. Wierda (22404198)

    Published 2025
    “…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”