Search alternatives:
pooling decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), coping decreased (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
pooling decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), coping decreased (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Amubarvimab/ Romlusevimab.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Tixagevimab/ Cilgavimab.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Bamlanivimab.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
Antibody and antigen responses by baseline anti-spike neutralizing response assay positivity.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
Baseline patient characteristics across neutralizing monoclonal antibody trials.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
-
16
-
17
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”