Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
partner support » parental support (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 80 for search '(( partner support decrease ) OR ( ct ((largest decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Boxplot comparing Ct values for HD in flies and clothes.

    Boxplot comparing Ct values for HD in flies and clothes. by Philippe Ndzomo (17706039)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Table 1_Risk and protective factors for interpersonal revictimization in people with post-traumatic stress symptoms: a systematic review.docx

    Table 1_Risk and protective factors for interpersonal revictimization in people with post-traumatic stress symptoms: a systematic review.docx by Christin Kühner (22816925)

    Published 2025
    “…The protective factors, social support and adaptive coping, did not consistently reduce revictimization.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Table 2_Risk and protective factors for interpersonal revictimization in people with post-traumatic stress symptoms: a systematic review.docx

    Table 2_Risk and protective factors for interpersonal revictimization in people with post-traumatic stress symptoms: a systematic review.docx by Christin Kühner (22816925)

    Published 2025
    “…The protective factors, social support and adaptive coping, did not consistently reduce revictimization.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    S1 Data. Bibliometric analysis. S2 Data. Estrogen level analysis. S3 Data. MicroCT quantification. S4 Data. Markers of bone metabolism.

    S1 Data. Bibliometric analysis. S2 Data. Estrogen level analysis. S3 Data. MicroCT quantification. S4 Data. Markers of bone metabolism. by Yan She (8639796)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Study design.

    Study design. by Lars van Tuin (22593160)

    Published 2025
    “…As hypothesized, the results indicate that a supportive partner relationship is associated with higher satisfaction of basic needs, which in turn enhances work engagement and decreases the risk of burnout. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Model 2, direct and indirect effects.

    Model 2, direct and indirect effects. by Lars van Tuin (22593160)

    Published 2025
    “…As hypothesized, the results indicate that a supportive partner relationship is associated with higher satisfaction of basic needs, which in turn enhances work engagement and decreases the risk of burnout. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Path coefficients.

    Path coefficients. by Lars van Tuin (22593160)

    Published 2025
    “…As hypothesized, the results indicate that a supportive partner relationship is associated with higher satisfaction of basic needs, which in turn enhances work engagement and decreases the risk of burnout. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Pearson’s correlation matrix.

    Pearson’s correlation matrix. by Lars van Tuin (22593160)

    Published 2025
    “…As hypothesized, the results indicate that a supportive partner relationship is associated with higher satisfaction of basic needs, which in turn enhances work engagement and decreases the risk of burnout. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    List of the subjects.

    List of the subjects. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Boxplot of the cardiac output of the wolves and dogs.

    Boxplot of the cardiac output of the wolves and dogs. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Results of the survival model for the latency to eat the food.

    Results of the survival model for the latency to eat the food. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    List of recorded behaviours (adapted from (24)).

    List of recorded behaviours (adapted from (24)). by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Schematic representation of the different positions the familiar human holds during the test.

    Schematic representation of the different positions the familiar human holds during the test. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Results of the binomial GLMM model for the final choice.

    Results of the binomial GLMM model for the final choice. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Latency to take the food in function of the age of the subjects.

    Latency to take the food in function of the age of the subjects. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Number of wolves and dogs who made a positive final choice during the test by taking the food.

    Number of wolves and dogs who made a positive final choice during the test by taking the food. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Instructions for the human during the test.

    Instructions for the human during the test. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    The experimental set-up we used.

    The experimental set-up we used. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Dataset.

    Dataset. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Summary of the variables analysed.

    Summary of the variables analysed. by Hillary Jean-Joseph (9676166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: