Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Participants enrollment.
Published 2025“…Attitude improved from 16.76 (93.1%) at baseline to 17.74 (98.6%) at the six-week mark. …”
-
6
KAP assessment scores (n = 422).
Published 2025“…Attitude improved from 16.76 (93.1%) at baseline to 17.74 (98.6%) at the six-week mark. …”
-
7
-
8
Analysis of TO dynamics (pre-epidemic).
Published 2024“…The test results demonstrated that the model was valid and the results were feasible.…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Analysis of FROM dynamics (pre-epidemic).
Published 2024“…The test results demonstrated that the model was valid and the results were feasible.…”
-
12
Pre-post comparison of study variables.
Published 2025“…Initial data comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Pretest and postest data were compared using the Wilcoxon test.…”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20