Search alternatives:
growing optimization » drawing optimization (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search), growth optimization (Expand Search)
process optimization » model optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
data growing » data showing (Expand Search), data groupings (Expand Search), waste growing (Expand Search)
growing optimization » drawing optimization (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search), growth optimization (Expand Search)
process optimization » model optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
data growing » data showing (Expand Search), data groupings (Expand Search), waste growing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.
Published 2022Subjects: -
10
Boxplots analysis of the tested algorithms using average error rate across 21 datasets.
Published 2022Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Short overview of the primary dataset.
Published 2023“…Furthermore, on (HDD Mono) the SMO classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction fault in terms of 80/20 (87.72%), 70/30 (89.41%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.38%), and (HDD-Multi) in terms of 80/20 (93.64%), 70/30 (90.91%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.20%). Whereas, primary data results found RF classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction in terms of 80/20 (97.14%), 70/30 (96.19%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.85%) in the primary data results, but the algorithm complexity (0.17 seconds) is not good. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20