Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
binary wave » binary image (Expand Search)
wave based » made based (Expand Search), game based (Expand Search), rate based (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
binary wave » binary image (Expand Search)
wave based » made based (Expand Search), game based (Expand Search), rate based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Development and testing of an ARSD algorithm: Read, Understand, Learn, & Excel (Kucheria et al., 2019)
Published 2019“…Currently, no tools exist to detect a reader’s use of strategies. The primary aim of this study was to develop Read, Understand, Learn, & Excel, an automated tool designed to detect reading strategy use and explore its accuracy in detecting strategies when students read digital, expository text.…”
-
4
FBD-SV-2024
Published 2024“…<p dir="ltr">The Flying Bird object Dataset in Surveillance Video (FBD-SV-2024) for surveillance video flying bird object detection algorithm development and performance evaluation.…”
-
5
-
6
DataSheet1_A novel dataset and deep learning object detection benchmark for grapevine pest surveillance.pdf
Published 2024“…Assisted by entomologists, we performed the annotation process, trained, and compared the performance of two state-of-the-art object detection algorithms: YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN. …”
-
7
-
8
Supplementary Material for: The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
Published 2019“…<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To use an individual participant data meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of two PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithms for detecting major depression and compare accuracy between the algorithms and the standard PHQ-9 cutoff score of ≥10. …”
-
9
Summary of results of naïve Bayes algorithms.
Published 2024“…Algorithms trained without auditory variables as features were statistically worse (p < .001) in both the primary measure of area under the curve (0.82/0.78) and the secondary measure of accuracy (72.3%/74.5%) for the Gaussian and kernel algorithms respectively.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20