Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
primary data » primary care (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
-
1
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
2
Parameter settings for algorithms.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
3
Parameter settings for algorithms.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
4
Average runtime of different algorithms.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
5
Average runtime of different algorithms.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
6
Flowchart of GJO-GWO algorithm.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
7
-
8
Detailed information of benchmark functions.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
9
Evaluation metrics of the models’ performance.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
10
Detailed information of datasets.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
11
Friedman test results.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
12
Average number of selected features.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
13
Wilcoxon rank sum test results.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
14
Wilcoxon rank sum test results.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
15
Average number of selected features.
Published 2024“…<div><p>This paper proposes a feature selection method based on a hybrid optimization algorithm that combines the Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). …”
-
16
-
17
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
18
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
19
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
20
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”