Estimating dopamine effects on humans. by Domenico Guarino (20428000)

The codes and data for "Lane Extraction from Trajectories at Road Intersections Based on Graph Transformer Network" by Chongshan Wan (19247614)

“…Each lane includes 'geometry' and 'inter_id' attributes.</li></ul><h2>Codes</h2><p dir="ltr">This repository contains the following Python codes：</p><ul><li>`data_processing.py`: Contains the implementation of data processing and feature extraction. …”

Pseudo live-stream of EEG data is generated, and a simple pick-and-place flowchart is designed for channel selection and filtering. by Gursimran Singh (575288)

MATH_code : False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grids based on Reservoir Computing by Carl-Hendrik Peters (21530624)

“…</li><li><b>3_literature_analysis_and_mapping.ipynb</b><br>Contains the Python code used for executing the systematic mapping study (SMS), including automated processing of literature data and thematic clustering.…”

Evaluation and Statistical Analysis Code for "Multi-Task Learning for Joint Fisheye Compression and Perception for Autonomous Driving" by Basem Ahmed (18127861)

“…</li></ul><p dir="ltr">These scripts are implemented in Python using the PyTorch framework and are provided to ensure the reproducibility of the experimental results presented in the manuscript.…”

Monte Carlo Simulation Code for Evaluating Cognitive Biases in Penalty Shootouts Using ABAB and ABBA Formats by Raul MATSUSHITA (10276562)

“…<p dir="ltr">This Python code implements a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the impact of cognitive biases on penalty shootouts under two formats: ABAB (alternating shots) and ABBA (similar to tennis tiebreak format). …”

Segmentation module training details. by Khelina Fedorchuk (19130089)

The codes and data for "A Graph Convolutional Neural Network-based Method for Predicting Computational Intensity of Geocomputation" by FirstName LastName (20554465)

“…The <b>innovations</b> and <b>steps</b> in Case 3, including data download, sample generation, and parallel computation optimization, were independently developed and are not dependent on the GeoCube’s code.</p><h2>Requirements</h2><p dir="ltr">The codes use the following dependencies with Python 3.8</p><ul><li>torch==2.0.0</li><li>torch_geometric==2.5.3</li><li>networkx==2.6.3</li><li>pyshp==2.3.1</li><li>tensorrt==8.6.1</li><li>matplotlib==3.7.2</li><li>scipy==1.10.1</li><li>scikit-learn==1.3.0</li><li>geopandas==0.13.2</li></ul><p><br></p>…”

The codes and data for "A Graph Convolutional Neural Network-based Method for Predicting Computational Intensity of Geocomputation" by FirstName LastName (20554465)

“…The <b>innovations</b> and <b>steps</b> in Case 3, including data download, sample generation, and parallel computation optimization, were independently developed and are not dependent on the GeoCube’s code.</p><h2>Requirements</h2><p dir="ltr">The codes use the following dependencies with Python 3.8</p><ul><li>torch==2.0.0</li><li>torch_geometric==2.5.3</li><li>networkx==2.6.3</li><li>pyshp==2.3.1</li><li>tensorrt==8.6.1</li><li>matplotlib==3.7.2</li><li>scipy==1.10.1</li><li>scikit-learn==1.3.0</li><li>geopandas==0.13.2</li></ul><p><br></p>…”

Data features examined for potential biases. by Harry Hochheiser (3413396)

“…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”

Analysis topics. by Harry Hochheiser (3413396)

“…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”

Datasets To EVAL. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

Statistical significance test results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

How RAG work. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

OpenBookQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

AI2_ARC experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

TQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

E-EVAL experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”

ScienceQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”