Search alternatives:
models representing » model representing (Expand Search), models represent (Expand Search), samples representing (Expand Search)
code representing » model representing (Expand Search), tpd representing (Expand Search), nov representing (Expand Search)
python models » motion models (Expand Search), pelton models (Expand Search)
models representing » model representing (Expand Search), models represent (Expand Search), samples representing (Expand Search)
code representing » model representing (Expand Search), tpd representing (Expand Search), nov representing (Expand Search)
python models » motion models (Expand Search), pelton models (Expand Search)
-
1
Resolving Harvesting Errors in Institutional Repository Migration : Using Python Scripts with VS Code and LLM Integration.
Published 2025“…Therefore, we decided to create a dedicated Python program using Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted coding.…”
-
2
City-level GDP estimates for China under alternative pathways from 2020 to 2100-python code
Published 2025“…The dataset is complemented by processing code and raw input data in the "Python_Code" directory to ensure full reproducibility. …”
-
3
Python code for hierarchical cluster analysis of detected R-strategies from rule-based NLP on 500 circular economy definitions
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr">This Python code was optimized and debugged using ChatGPT-4o to ensure implementation efficiency, accuracy, and clarity.…”
-
4
-
5
Python implementation of a wildfire propagation example using m:n-CAk over Z and R.
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><p dir="ltr">## Files in the Project</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><p dir="ltr">### Python Scripts</p><p dir="ltr">- **Wildfire_on_m_n-CAk.py**: This file contains the main code for the fire cellular automaton. …”
-
6
Code interpreter with LLM.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
7
-
8
Datasets To EVAL.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
9
Statistical significance test results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
10
How RAG work.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
11
OpenBookQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
12
AI2_ARC experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
13
TQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
14
E-EVAL experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
15
TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
16
ScienceQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
17
-
18
PTPC-UHT bounce
Published 2025“…<br>It contains the full Python implementation of the PTPC bounce model (<code>PTPC_UHT_bounce.py</code>) and representative outputs used to generate the figures in the paper. …”
-
19
-
20