Showing 21 - 40 results of 235 for search '(( python policy implementation ) OR ( ((python model) OR (python code)) represent ))', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 21

    How RAG work. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  2. 22

    OpenBookQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  3. 23

    AI2_ARC experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  4. 24

    TQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  5. 25

    E-EVAL experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  6. 26

    TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  7. 27

    ScienceQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  8. 28
  9. 29

    System Hardware ID Generator Script: A Cross-Platform Hardware Identification Tool by Pavel Izosimov (20096259)

    Published 2024
    “…This tool provides <a href="https://xn--mxac.net/local-python-code-protector.html" target="_blank">code obfuscation in Python</a> and <a href="https://xn--mxac.net/secure-python-code-manager.html" target="_blank">Python code encryption</a>, enabling developers to <a href="https://xn--mxac.net/local-python-code-protector.html" target="_blank">protect Python code</a> effectively.…”
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34

    PTPC-UHT bounce by David Parry (22169299)

    Published 2025
    “…<br>It contains the full Python implementation of the PTPC bounce model (<code>PTPC_UHT_bounce.py</code>) and representative outputs used to generate the figures in the paper. …”
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40