Search alternatives:
tool implementing » model implementing (Expand Search), trial implementing (Expand Search), from implementing (Expand Search)
python model » action model (Expand Search), motion model (Expand Search)
tool implementing » model implementing (Expand Search), trial implementing (Expand Search), from implementing (Expand Search)
python model » action model (Expand Search), motion model (Expand Search)
-
21
TQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
22
E-EVAL experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
23
TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
24
ScienceQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
25
Local Python Code Protector Script: A Tool for Source Code Protection and Secure Code Sharing
Published 2024“…<p dir="ltr">Local Python Code Protector Script: Advanced Tool for Python Code Protection and Secure Sharing</p><h2>Introduction</h2><p dir="ltr">The <b>Local Python Code Protector Script</b> is a powerful command-line tool designed to provide <a href="https://xn--mxac.net/local-python-code-protector.html" target="_blank"><b>source code protection</b></a> and <a href="https://xn--mxac.net/local-python-code-protector.html" target="_blank"><b>secure code sharing</b></a> for Python scripts. …”
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
PTPC-UHT bounce
Published 2025“…<br>It contains the full Python implementation of the PTPC bounce model (<code>PTPC_UHT_bounce.py</code>) and representative outputs used to generate the figures in the paper. …”
-
30
-
31
Comparison of BlueRecording with existing tools
Published 2025“…To enable efficient calculation of extracellular signals from large neural network simulations, we have developed <i>BlueRecording</i>, a pipeline consisting of standalone Python code, along with extensions to the Neurodamus simulation control application, the CoreNEURON computation engine, and the SONATA data format, to permit online calculation of such signals. …”
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
Heatmap showing the simulated output of the XOR circuit by Tamsir <i>et al</i>. [11].
Published 2025Subjects: -
36
Simulation results for the phage communication circuit from Pathania <i>et al</i>. [5].
Published 2025Subjects: -
37
-
38
Simulation results of the quorum sensing circuit by Omar Din <i>et al</i>. [28].
Published 2025Subjects: -
39
-
40