Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
9
-
10
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…With amplitude scaling the mean population activity was kept the same by scaling down the response amplitude for larger population (blue curve). …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Open data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant decrease in BMD in the lumbar spine (1.107 ± 0.109 and 1.075 ± 0.112 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), total body (1.135 ± 0.086 and 1.119 ± 0.085 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), and total proximal femur over the six months of EBF compared to the values obtained from the same EBF group at 15 days postpartum (mean percentage decreases in BMD of −3.4 ± 3.7% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in lumbar spine, −2.5 ± 3.4% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in total proximal femur, and −1.7 ± 1.9% (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) in total body). …”
-
20
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”