Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Open data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant decrease in BMD in the lumbar spine (1.107 ± 0.109 and 1.075 ± 0.112 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), total body (1.135 ± 0.086 and 1.119 ± 0.085 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), and total proximal femur over the six months of EBF compared to the values obtained from the same EBF group at 15 days postpartum (mean percentage decreases in BMD of −3.4 ± 3.7% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in lumbar spine, −2.5 ± 3.4% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in total proximal femur, and −1.7 ± 1.9% (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) in total body). …”
-
7
-
8
Diagram presenting the search process.
Published 2025“…The adjustment of the prediction equation was based on the assumptions that for the same values of variables that characterize work, the exposure calculated by the equation is equivalent to musculoskeletal load, and that the level of musculoskeletal load at a given time determines the experimentally measured decrease in force capabilities. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
K-means++ clustering algorithm.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20