Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,440 for search '(( scale ((stream decrease) OR (we decrease)) ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Decade-scale stream morphology and stream fish community structure in headwater streams draining Mississippi's National Forests by Loren Stearman (22284538)

    Published 2025
    “…We provide data for associated landscape-level covariates (land use, stream network topology) derived from remote sensing data sources. …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  13. 13

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  14. 14

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    The Vancouver Scar Scale. by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”